We don't just use AI coding tools — we engineered the guardrails, model routing, and review gates that make a fleet of specialized agents fast, safe, and production-ready. Every line ships behind a senior engineer's sign-off. Fixed price. Zero day rates.
cheaper than metered AI pricing for the same real usage.
Measured on our own usage data — the quality bar doesn't move.
Maersk Training brought us in to audit and rebuild after another vendor fell short.
Read the Maersk caseIndependent engineering for product teams that need something built, fixed, or audited — fixed price, senior review on every deliverable, no vague proposals and no consultants who disappear after kickoff.
The multiplier below isn't a discount — it's the throughput of an agent-native delivery model, reviewed like any other engineering work.
cheaper than metered AI pricing for the same real usage.
Every task fans out to the cheapest model tier that can do it correctly — not the most expensive one by default.
Specialized agents write, test, and document in parallel, working from one senior engineer's spec — and every change is verified at runtime, with evidence, before it counts as done.
Typecheck, security scan, senior review, adversarial verification, deploy check — five gates before anything reaches production.
The pipeline drives each change through integration, review, merge and deploy on its own, refusing to advance until the previous stage has passed. You get production code and the audit trail behind it, not a chat transcript.
The 5–6 months of foundation work Contentful doesn't ship out of the box. Typed content modeling-as-code, a composable block engine, real i18n, schema-driven forms, site search, CMS-driven analytics tracking, on-demand ISR, and an enterprise security posture. Drop it in, customize the brand, ship faster.
“It is extremely satisfying to be able to give Nicklas a scope and simply redirect my focus elsewhere, because I know Nicklas is capable of remaining critical of both Delivery-Quality, and Value-Sanity. Nicklas will take any request and turn it into a functional product.”
Cheap, fast models doing the typing is the leverage of agentic development — and unreviewed agent code reaching production is its core risk. So the production branch sits behind a mandatory gate: every change is read by the strongest model we run, acting as a senior developer, and a rejection blocks the merge until every finding is fixed.
A specialized agent finishes a change and pushes it toward production. The gate intercepts it — nothing merges by default.
The strongest model we run reviews the diff as a senior developer, at full effort, on every single change — and it runs the checks itself instead of trusting a green build.
Findings are terse and actionable — file, line, defect, failure mode, fix — most severe first. The merge stays blocked until every one is fixed.
The fix is re-reviewed against the previous verdict until it passes. Verdicts are posted on the pull request, so human review starts from the senior's findings — not a blank diff.
The gate sits in front of the production branch itself, so 100% of production-bound code gets senior judgment — not a sample, not a spot check.
Each re-review sees the previous verdict, so rounds converge instead of starting over — and an approval is keyed to the exact code it approved, so unchanged work is never reviewed twice.
Two distinct rejections escalate the change to an independent advisor model. Four, and the pipeline halts and hands the decision to a human.
The reviewer treats the code under review as evidence, never as instructions — text in a diff can't talk it into approving. And it demands proof the code was actually run.
A recent change to an AI assistant endpoint would have let usage slip past the cap that meters billing. The reviewer rejected it three times, as the bypass came back in increasingly subtle shapes — and before ruling, it verified its own claims against the actual source code of the SDK the endpoint is built on.
The endpoint accepted a client-supplied conversation as already started — anything claiming to be a continuation skipped the usage check. Rejected.
Next round, a denial-shaped response could be replayed back as if the cap had already been checked — nothing proved it came from the billing layer. Rejected.
Finally, the change presented an approval as already executed. The reviewer traced that claim through the SDK's source, showed it couldn't be true, and rejected the merge.
Bring a project you're scoping, a quote you don't trust, or a system you're stuck on. We'll be useful or we'll tell you who is.
Skip 5–6 months of foundation work. Starts at EUR 35,000, one-time license, your team owns the code.